Dave Lindorff: More Questions About Diebold Voting Machines – Did Hillary Really Win NH?
This entry was posted on Friday, January 11th, 2008 at 3:49 PM and filed under Articles, Elections/Voting, Legal, Politics. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.
2 Responses to “Dave Lindorff: More Questions About Diebold Voting Machines – Did Hillary Really Win NH?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
This whole things sounds like much ado about nothing. Why would the right wing WANT Hillary to win? After all, Hillary is far more likely to beat the Republican candidate than Obama is, given that she is “battle-tested” against the right, where Obama is a neophyte, and is unlikely to withstand the kind of blistering, negative campaign that the right will undoubtedly engage in.
It is one thing to suggest that Diebold et al – whose owners, as the article notes, are right-wing Bush supporters – might well attempt vote fraud to have a Republican win over a Democrat. But to suggest that Diebold et al would put themselves at the same risk by attempting vote fraud between Democratic candidates stretches credulity to the breaking point.
Peace.
Posted on 11-Jan-08 at 6:31 pm | PermalinkDiebold just does the bidding of whoever (GOP, military contractors, multinationals, etc…) – and actually i think Hillary polls about the same or worse than Obama against the GOP (McCain being the hardest to beat) .. at least in the polls I’ve seen .. and guess who polls the best? (hint, his initials are JE)
Posted on 12-Jan-08 at 3:57 pm | Permalink