NYT: House Passes Security Bill; Senate Stance Is Uncertain [See my comment]
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/10/washington/10homeland.html?ref=washington&pagewanted=print
Although it would seem on its face that this type of bill would simply be a continuation of previous policies, what is remarkable about it is that it includes only “protectionist” items – e.g., cargo container inspections, preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, etc. – but nothing invasive of civil liberties or privacy.
This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 10th, 2007 at 10:45 AM and filed under Articles, Civil Rights, Politics, Privacy. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.
