NYT Op-Ed (Brooks): Ends Without Means

http://select.nytimes.com/2006/09/14/opinion/14brooks.html?pagewanted=print

Assessing Bush’s self-assured “vision” versus the means by which he does or does not help bring that vision to bear, Brooks says, after a meeting Bush had with a few columnists, “Bush was pressured about Iraqi troop levels…His general response was that, during Vietnam, tatical decisions were made in the White House. ‘I thought it was a mistake then, and I think it’s a mistake now.’ So on troop levels and other tactical issues, Bush defers to Gen. George Casey, who is in Iraq. He asks questions, but does not contradict the experts.”

Although I am vehemently opposed to this war, if only Bush had done this at the outset – not “micromanaged” the war, but listened to “the experts” – it is likely that things would not be as bad as they are.

Of Bush, Brooks also says, “There is none of that hunger for approval that is common to [politicians]. This is the most inner-directed man on the globe.”

Which is, of course, exactly the problem: he is so “inner-directed” that it makes him myopic, as well as largely disinterested in external input and advice, except from those he already trusts.

 

 

This entry was posted on Thursday, September 14th, 2006 at 11:45 AM and filed under Articles. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.