The hidden cost of Senate gridlock: Obama can’t fire anyone

By Ezra Klein | Sunday, February 14, 2010 | The Washington Post

“…The easiest way to fix all this would be to reduce the number of positions requiring Senate confirmation. It’s obvious why the nominee for Treasury secretary must come before the Senate, but do we need a hearing for the director of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development? The undersecretary of commerce for export administration? The co-chair of the Northern Border Regional Commission? How many senators, exactly, do we think have an informed opinion on these positions, much less on the nominees to fill them? There’s a reason that a board of directors will pick a company’s chief executive but not vote on each and every product manager….”…BS

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/11/AR2010021103901_pf.html

 

 

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 14th, 2010 at 8:30 AM and filed under Media, Politics. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.