NYT Op-Ed (Rich): Obama Is Not a Miracle Elixir

http://select.nytimes.com/2006/10/22/opinion/22rich.html?pagewanted=print

Re the midterm elections, Rich says, “The tough question is not whether the Democrats can win, but what will happen if they do. The party’s message in this campaign has offered no vision beyond bashing Mr. Bush and pledging to revisit the scandals and the disastrous legislation that went down on his watch.” I would add that, as other pundits have noted, even if the Dems win both houses, we will still have a sitting president with a veto pen.

Re Obama, Rich says, “The more important issue is not whether Obama will seek the presidency, but what kind of candidate he would be. If the Democratic Party is to be more that a throw-out-Bush party, it can’t settle for yet again repackaging its well-worn ideas, however worthy, with a new slogan containing the word ‘New.’ It needs a major infusion of steadfast leadership.” And while Rich believes Obama might be able to provide that leadership, he adds, “The Democrats may well win on Election Day this year. But one of their best hopes for long-term viability in the post-Bush era is that Barack Obama steps up and changes the party before the party of terminal timidity and equivocation changes him.”

 

 

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 22nd, 2006 at 8:47 AM and filed under Articles. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.

One Response to “NYT Op-Ed (Rich): Obama Is Not a Miracle Elixir”

  1. Mike Blaxill said:

    hey – i fixed it for you .. you have to specify which text you want the link to be by shading it .. if you don’t then the whole post is the link

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.