[Mb-hair] Fw: [Mb-civic] Fw: Safer World?

[SharmagneS at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/17/04 05:01:02 PM, hotprojects at nyc.rr.com writes:


> 
> dont be silly
> 
>  theres nothing wrong with t and a
> 
>  it seems to me hair had this nude scene
> 
>  women should have the same rights to objectify a man
> 
>  but i dont see why men shouldnt objectify women
> 
> 
HAiR had a nude scene, but it wasn't required!
   
You wrote: 

and show clevage
very hot for men with a taste for the bizarre
( which of course is all of us guys in show biz etc)

My late husband was in "Show Biz" as you call it,   and   I dont think you 
could classify him as having a taste for the Bizarre, or for thinking a show of 
clevage was "hot"..   Speak for yourself!     I hate gratuitous sex or nudity 
in films.   


The problem with T and A is that many fine actresses do not get meaty (excuse 
the pun) roles because they refuse to do nudity, so some half baked actress 
with big tits who is willing to flop them out at the drop of a hankie gets the 
role.       And I notice T and A is about a woman disrobing or showing off her 
body.. T and A is not about a man showinh his pecker!   Would that be P and 
A?  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-hair/attachments/20041220/d0abbdfd/attachment.htm