[Mb-civic] How to Fight Terrorism

[ean at sbcglobal.net]

The Online Beat:  by John Nichols
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&pid=4759

How to Fight Terrorism
	
President Bush unwittingly provided an appropriate response to the 
gruesome terrorist attacks on London.

Highlighting the "vivid" contrast between the Group of Eight summit in 
Gleneagles, Scotland -- where the world's most powerful leaders have 
been forced by grassroots pressure to address issues of global poverty 
and climate change -- and the carnage in London after coordinated 
bomb blasts killed dozens of commuters Thursday morning, Bush said, 
"On the one hand, we got people here who are working to alleviate 
poverty and to help rid the world of the pandemic of AIDS and that are 
working on ways to have a clean environment. And on the other hand, 
you've got people killing innocent people. And the contrast couldn't be 
clearer between the intentions and the hearts of those of us who care 
deeply about human rights and human liberty, and those who kill, 
those who've got such evil in their heart that they will take the lives of 
innocent folks."

Bush went on to promise that, "we will spread an ideology of hope and 
compassion that will overwhelm their ideology of hate."

Imagine the cries of outrage and incomprehension that would have 
arisen from right-wing talk radio and television pundits if a President Al 
Gore or a President John Kerry had called, in the immediate aftermath 
of an attack linked to Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, for 
spreading an "ideology of hope and compassion" as part of the 
response to terrorism.

Imagine if a President Gore or a Kerry had spoken, as Bush did, of 
bringing those responsible for the attacks "to justice" rather than 
pledging to "hunt them down and kill them."

Imagine if a President Gore or Kerry had failed to make any mention of 
the invasion and occupation of Iraq -- supposedly a critical front in the 
"war on terror" -- at such a moment.

Bush's amen corner in the media is, of course, packed with hypocrites 
who hear echoes of Churchill in the president's every utterance, just as 
they detect the language of treason in the mere mention of alternative 
approaches to fighting terrorism.

But the failings of his followers ought not obscure the fact that the 
president's response -- intentionally or otherwise --went to the issues 
that should be addressed.

Bush expressed his "heartfelt condolences," he called for bringing the 
killers to justice. And then he spoke -- in the context of a broader 
discussion about alleviating poverty, disease and environmental decay 
-- about combating terrorism with "hope and compassion." In the end, 
it will only be when hope and compassion are delivered to the world's 
most dispossessed peoples -- through debt reduction, aid and 
measures that combat the spread of easily treated diseases -- that 
those who preach violence as a response to inequity and injustice will 
be sufficiently marginalized to make it possible to talk of "winning" a 
war on terrorism.

Is it possible that the president is beginning to accept this reality? 
Could he be coming to realize that the challenges posed by 
international terrorism cannot be met merely with cowboy rhetoric and 
bombs?

Surely, the painful recognition that, almost four years after the 
September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the 
Pentagon, al-Qaeda is apparently still capable of pulling off 
coordinated, and extremely deadly, attacks in one of the most security-
savvy cities on the planet ought to cause Bush to rethink his misguided 
response to what he describes as the great challenge of his 
presidency.

Unfortunately, Bush has shown little capacity for growth in his 
knowledge or understanding of world affairs. So it is wise to remain 
skeptical about how far he plans to take his "hope and compassion" 
response.

That said, we ought to hold the man to his words -- and to remind the 
president's amen corner that it was not Ted Kennedy or Nancy Pelosi 
who responded to the news of a terrorist attack with a discussion about 
alleviating poverty and ridding the world of disease. It was George W. 
Bush. And, at least in that moment, he was right.



-- 
You are currently on Mha Atma's Earth Action Network email list, 
option D (up to 3 emails/day).  To be removed, or to switch options 
(option A - 1x/week, option B - 3/wk, option C - up to 1x/day, option D - 
up to 3x/day) please reply and let us know!  If someone forwarded you 
this email and you want to be on our list, send an email to 
ean at sbcglobal.net and tell us which option you'd like.


"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
   ---   George Orwell


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20050707/688651e6/attachment.htm