[Mb-civic] Feingold's Key Vote

[ean at sbcglobal.net]

Published on Thursday, January 27, 2005 by the Capital Times 
(Madison, Wisconsin) 
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0127-34.htm
Feingold's Key Vote 
Editorial 
When it comes to the confirmation of Cabinet members, U.S. Sen. 
Russ Feingold, D-Wis., casts the most critical vote.
That is why the fact that he joined fellow Judiciary Committee 
members to oppose the nomination of White House counsel Alberto 
Gonzales as attorney general should be seen by the rest of the 
Senate, and the nation, as an indication that Gonzales cannot be 
allowed to take charge of the Department of Justice.
Why is Feingold's vote so significant? For the simple reason that no 
other senator brings to Cabinet confirmation debates Feingold's 
record of nonpartisanship.
Holding firmly over the years to the standard that a president has a 
right to pick his team, Feingold has steered clear of the partisan and 
ideological battles that often arise with regard to nominees for 
Cabinet posts. This has caused him no small measure of political 
discomfort, as when he voted in 2001 to confirm John Ashcroft as 
attorney general, despite the fact that most of Feingold's 
progressive allies in and out of Congress were making the case 
against the Missourian.
"My votes may not have always pleased my political supporters, or 
my party's leadership," he explains. "But in carrying out my part in 
the constitutional scheme, as one who is asked to advise on and 
consent to a president's nominations, I am guided by my conscience 
and by the history and practices of the United States Senate. 
Rejecting a Cabinet nominee is a very rare event. The decision to 
do so must never be taken lightly."
Thus, when Feingold voted Wednesday against the Gonzales 
nomination, it could not be read as a partisan gesture.
It was a damning indictment.
"I cannot support his nomination," the senator explained. "Not 
because he is too conservative, or because I disagree with a 
specific policy position he has taken, but because I am not 
convinced that he possesses the abiding respect for the rule of law 
that our country needs in these difficult times in its attorney general."
That is a damning indictment.
Even more damning was Feingold's explanation of his concerns.
"Judge Gonzales' appearance before the committee was deeply 
disappointing. When given the opportunity under oath to show that 
he would be adequately committed to the rule of law as our nation's 
chief law enforcement officer, he failed to do so. He indicated that 
the infamous OLC (Office of Legal Counsel) torture memo is no 
longer operative, but that he does not disagree with the conclusions 
expressed in it. He reiterated erroneous interpretations of the effect 
that applying the Geneva Conventions to the war on Afghanistan 
would have on the treatment of members of al-Qaida captured in 
combat. Most disturbingly, he refused time after time to repudiate 
the most far-reaching and significant conclusion of the OLC memo - 
that the president has the authority as commander in chief to 
immunize those acting at his direction from the application of U.S. 
law."
"This failure," Feingold added, "goes directly to the question of his 
commitment to the rule of law. Under our system of government, the 
attorney general of the United States may be called upon to 
investigate and even prosecute the president. We cannot have a 
person heading the United States Department of Justice who 
believes that the president is above the law."
Before the Gonzales nomination is considered by the full Senate, 
wavering Democrats and Republicans who are generally inclined to 
back President Bush should reflect on Feingold's concerns. If 
Alberto Gonzales failed to pass the Feingold test, then, surely, he 
should not be confirmed as attorney general. 
                        © 2005 Capital Times 
                                 ###

-- 
You are currently on Mha Atma's Earth Action Network email list, 
option D (up to 3 emails/day).  To be removed, or to switch options 
(option A - 1x/week, option B - 3/wk, option C - up to 1x/day, option 
D - up to 3x/day) please reply and let us know!  If someone 
forwarded you this email and you want to be on our list, send an 
email to ean at sbcglobal.net and tell us which option you'd like.


"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
   ---   George Orwell


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20050128/593422ca/attachment.htm