Chelsea and the kid gloves

By Elinor Lipman | Monday, February 18, 2008 | The Washington Post

“…I MUST be woefully misaligned with family values or linguistically tone deaf to be so deeply offended by MSNBC’s suspension of Emmy award-winning Washington correspondent David Shuster. His crime: uttering a word no one liked. As a substitute host on ‘Tucker’ Feb. 7, he discussed Chelsea Clinton’s phone calls to superdelegates. Shuster asked pundit Bill Press, ‘Doesn’t it seem like Chelsea is being pimped out in some weird sort of way?’….”…BS

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/02/18/chelsea_and_the_kid_gloves?mode=PF

 

 

This entry was posted on Monday, February 18th, 2008 at 6:25 AM and filed under Elections/Voting, Media, Politics. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.

One Response to “Chelsea and the kid gloves”

  1. ben stagg said:

    I wonder if being ‘pimped out’ made Chelsea feel all tingly inside?
    It would be nice, as the article suggests, if she were to say, ‘come on, the guy has appologised. That’s enough.’

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.