The British Medical Journal Shows Misjudgement, Bias in Further Attack on Andrew Wakefield

John Stone at Age of Autism ..

The publication of new/old allegations of fraud against Andrew Wakefield in BMJ follows on a succession of events in 2010 in which manifest editorial bias was shown, and in which the journal seemed to be falling over backwards to aid journalist Brian Deer in his crusade against Wakefield. The journal removed correspondence from its website questioning Deer’s prolonged access to confidential medical and legal documents, blocked correspondence from both professionals and members of the public questioning Deer’s understanding and representation of the evidence at the GMC hearing, and refused to acknowledge Deer’s competing interest (documented and established in a High Court judgement) as the complainant in the GMC case against the three doctors

.. read more

 

 

This entry was posted on Friday, January 7th, 2011 at 9:37 AM and filed under Blog Posts, Crime, Health, Media, Youth. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.