NYT: Middle Stance Emerges in Debate Over Climate

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/01/science/01climate.html?pagewanted=print

“[These scientists] agree that accumulating carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping smokestack and tailpipe gases probably pose a momentous environmental challenge, but say the appropriate response is more akin to buying fire insurance and installing sprinklers and new wiring in an old, irreplaceable house (the home planet) than to fighting a fire already raging.”

Who are they kidding? You cannot purchase fire insurance for a house that’s already on fire. Since when did “fence-sitting” become an acceptable middle ground – especially when even they admit that “the house is on fire?”

 

 

This entry was posted on Monday, January 1st, 2007 at 1:31 PM and filed under Articles, Environment, Politics, Science. Follow comments here with the RSS 2.0 feed. Skip to the end and leave a response. Trackbacks are closed.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.