Comments on: from Linda: Subject: 9/11 questions answered http://www.michaelbutler.com/blog/civic/2006/08/31/from-linda-subject-911-questions-answered/ Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.- George Orwell Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:04:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Ian Alterman http://www.michaelbutler.com/blog/civic/2006/08/31/from-linda-subject-911-questions-answered/#comment-140 Thu, 07 Sep 2006 16:09:15 +0000 http://www.michaelbutler.com/blog/civic/2006/08/31/from-linda-subject-911-questions-answered/#comment-140 There are four books one should read in order to get a clear sense of the foundation upon which much of the 9/11 truth movement is based - a foundation that is far more solid than the 9/11 Commission Report (which is the ENTIRE foundation of the governments "official story"), which even Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton have now admitted was "compromised" by an Administration that lied and was not forthcoming with important documents. The four books - which should be read in this order - are: 1. The Terror Timeline, by Paul Thompson. Using only mainstream media headlines and stories (i.e., those that the average American is likely to believe over "alternative" news), Thompson's timeline shows that 9/11 could not have been an "accident" - even of government negligence and ineptitude - but had to be a "staged event." 2. The New Pearl Harbor, by David Ray Griffin. Unquestionably the most thorough and respected 9/11 researcher, Griffin gives a history of "false flag" operations, including those by the U.S., and lays out solid support for 9/11 being such an operation: i.e., staged by our government but blamed on others. 3. The 9/11 Commission Report. As the old saying goes, "Know thy enemy." It is critical that anyone who plans to discuss "9/11 truth" read this so that they are conversant with the government's alleged support for its "official story." 4. The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, by David Ray Griffin. In this book, Griffin provides a virtual item-by-item rebuttal of claims made or "facts" given in the Report. He also discusses the serious conflicts of interest of most of the Commissioners, and the outrageous appointment of Bush devotee Philip Zelikow as Executive Director of the Commission. This reading will take the average Civic member about two months or so. But it will give you years' worth of solid information and support in discussing 9/11 truth with others. Peace. There are four books one should read in order to get a clear sense of the foundation upon which much of the 9/11 truth movement is based - a foundation that is far more solid than the 9/11 Commission Report (which is the ENTIRE foundation of the governments “official story”), which even Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton have now admitted was “compromised” by an Administration that lied and was not forthcoming with important documents.

The four books - which should be read in this order - are:

1. The Terror Timeline, by Paul Thompson. Using only mainstream media headlines and stories (i.e., those that the average American is likely to believe over “alternative” news), Thompson’s timeline shows that 9/11 could not have been an “accident” - even of government negligence and ineptitude - but had to be a “staged event.”

2. The New Pearl Harbor, by David Ray Griffin. Unquestionably the most thorough and respected 9/11 researcher, Griffin gives a history of “false flag” operations, including those by the U.S., and lays out solid support for 9/11 being such an operation: i.e., staged by our government but blamed on others.

3. The 9/11 Commission Report. As the old saying goes, “Know thy enemy.” It is critical that anyone who plans to discuss “9/11 truth” read this so that they are conversant with the government’s alleged support for its “official story.”

4. The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, by David Ray Griffin. In this book, Griffin provides a virtual item-by-item rebuttal of claims made or “facts” given in the Report. He also discusses the serious conflicts of interest of most of the Commissioners, and the outrageous appointment of Bush devotee Philip Zelikow as Executive Director of the Commission.

This reading will take the average Civic member about two months or so. But it will give you years’ worth of solid information and support in discussing 9/11 truth with others.

Peace.

]]> by: Mike Blaxill http://www.michaelbutler.com/blog/civic/2006/08/31/from-linda-subject-911-questions-answered/#comment-137 Thu, 31 Aug 2006 20:40:25 +0000 http://www.michaelbutler.com/blog/civic/2006/08/31/from-linda-subject-911-questions-answered/#comment-137 ]]> by: Mike Blaxill http://www.michaelbutler.com/blog/civic/2006/08/31/from-linda-subject-911-questions-answered/#comment-136 Thu, 31 Aug 2006 18:56:13 +0000 http://www.michaelbutler.com/blog/civic/2006/08/31/from-linda-subject-911-questions-answered/#comment-136 The Popular Mechanics has been widely refuted by college professors, physicists et al - here's one link <a href="http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html" rel="nofollow">911research.wtc7</a> another <a href="http://911physics.co.nr/" rel="nofollow">911physics.co.nr</a> another <a href="http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm" rel="nofollow">serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics</a> As for the Pentagon - four words.."Lets See the Video" - there's been plenty of conflicting eyewitness accounts so lets see the videos they confiscated from the hotel across the street and the gas station and others - the one they put out a few months ago was a joke and really just confirmed our suspicions..every single news anchors says "this video confirms that a 757 hit the Pentagon blah blah blah" and then they show the video and you don't see squat The Popular Mechanics has been widely refuted by college professors, physicists et al -

here’s one link
911research.wtc7

another
911physics.co.nr

another
serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics

As for the Pentagon - four words..”Lets See the Video” - there’s been plenty of conflicting eyewitness accounts so lets see the videos they confiscated from the hotel across the street and the gas station and others - the one they put out a few months ago was a joke and really just confirmed our suspicions..every single news anchors says “this video confirms that a 757 hit the Pentagon blah blah blah” and then they show the video and you don’t see squat

]]>