[Mb-hair] also it would be nice if people commenting onthe60sactually received

Michael Butler michael at michaelbutler.com
Sun Sep 25 14:36:24 PDT 2005


The problem in not so much what one opines on the List as it is the
offensive way some remarks, frequently in fact, are received by the others.
Michael

> but yes nina in a way
> youre being older and having experienced more of the 60s
> etc
> or in those in the original company who were adults
> yes i believe you do have an appreciation i dont
> 
> and im just dramaturgical issues
> it is not blasphemy to argue for the updating of hair
> 
> but in any event i am not trying to offend anyone
> just trying to help
> 
> in the future i shall keep more of my opinions to myself
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Little Birdie" <lbirdie at hotmail.com>
> To: <mb-hair at islandlists.com>
> Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 4:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Mb-hair] also it would be nice if people commenting
> onthe60sactually remem
> 
> 
>> Richard,
>> 
>> I am afraid I must disagree strongly with your assertion that those who
>> remember the sixties, or have seen the original production are more
>> qualified to speak on these issues. By that logic I, being older than you
>> and having seen the original production many more times than you, and
> having
>> even been in it way back when, would be more qualified than you to have an
>> opinion here. Obviously I do not have more of a right to my opinion than
> you
>> do - we all are qualified to speak to what makes Hair work for us. That
>> someone doesn't remember the sixties, or only remembers it slightly, does
>> not make their opinion any more or less valid than those who were there
>> then. I saw the original production hundreds of times  - eight times a
> week
>> when I worked as the concession girl. Does that make my opinion more
>> important? Does my having been in the show in 1973 make it even more so?
> In
>> my humble opinion it does not.
>> 
>> There is another point you make (in a different email, but I speak to it
>> here to conserve bandwidth) that I feel I must comment on. You say:
>> 
>>> i am not being hostile and i dont care for how whenever someone dissents
> it
>>> is interpreted as hostility
>> 
>> I truly do not agree with you that people here respond to any disagreement
>> by interpreting it as hostility. While I completely understand that you do
>> not feel that your way of dialoging is hostile, I know that this problem
>> comes up with such regularity that I hope you can come to accept that
> people
>> here do interpret your style of disagreement as hostile. I accept that you
>> do not feel that you were being hostile, but if you are going to be a
> member
>> of a group you have to find a way to respect the general values of that
>> group, whether you agree with them or not. So while I accept that you do
> not
>> feel that the way your disagree with people is hostile I would encourage
> you
>> to accept that in the general value system of this group your style of
>> writing feels hostile to many of us. There is no judgment inherent in
> this -
>> we are not wrong for feeling this, and you are not wrong for feeling you
> are
>> not hostile. But if you want to be a member of this group you will need to
>> communicate your thoughts in a way that isn't interpreted as argumentative
>> by the group. In certain cultures things that we wouldn't think twice
> about
>> doing are considered very rude. If you were traveling in a different
> culture
>> I would hope that you would make an effort to adapt your behavior to the
>> societal rules of that culture. Think of this as a situation like that.
> Even
>> if you feel that we are completely wrong to interpret you as hostile I
>> encourage you to write in a style that opens discussion instead of causing
>> argument.
>> 
>> I have made every effort to write about these things in a way that
> stresses
>> that this is only my opinion. Please note that I understand that you feel
>> you do nothing wrong in these situations. Please show me (and others) the
>> respect that I have tried to show you in this post. For instance: By all
>> means tell Jim why you feel it is better to update certain portions of
> Hair,
>> and allow him to tell you why he disagrees. But when you turn it into a
>> discussion of why your opinion is more valid than his that tends to be
>> interpreted as hostile, and I ask as the moderator here that you don't
> post
>> things like that.
>> 
>> Nina
>> 
>> The Hair Archives
>> http://www.michaelbutler.com/hair
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mb-hair mailing list
>> Mb-hair at islandlists.com
>> http://www.islandlists.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mb-hair
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mb-hair mailing list
> Mb-hair at islandlists.com
> http://www.islandlists.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mb-hair



More information about the Mb-hair mailing list