[Mb-civic] FW: 9-11 Questions Art Bell Refuses to Answer

[Michael Butler]

------ Forwarded Message
From: "ernesto ciccarelli" <chiosceola at hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:30:33 -0500

Subject: FW: 9-11 Questions Art Bell Refuses to Answer

>TEN 9-11 QUESTIONS ART BELL REFUSES TO ANSWER
>    by Victor Thorn - August 12, 2004
>
>QUESTION ONE  The Pentagon: The government contends that Flight 77  a
>Boeing 757  struck the ground floor of the Pentagon, completely entered the
>building; then disintegrated due to intense heat from the explosion. Yet
>photographs of the initial hole in the northwest wall show it to be only 18
>feet in diameter. This poses a problem, for a Boeing 757's wingspan is 124'
>10" across, while it measures 44' 6" from the ground to the tip of its
>tail. How could this massive airliner fit through an 18' hole, especially
>when the windows on each side of the initial hole, as well as on top of it
>survived the crash and were unbroken? In addition, the front lawn of the
>Pentagon was photographed as completely untouched directly following the
>crash, with no tire marks, scorch marks, ruts, or burn marks. It
>practically looked like a putting green, yet the plane struck on the GROUND
>FLOOR. Last but not least, a Boeing 757 weighs 65 tons. The government
>contends that all the wreckage, including the tempered steel and galvanized
>aluminum it was made of, was vaporized into thin air; yet the Pentagon's
>infrastructure did not vaporize, while some of the deceased Pentagon
>employees were identified by their fingerprints! So, human flesh doesn't
>vaporize, but metal and aluminum do? Please explain.
>
>QUESTION TWO  WORLD TRADE CENTER BUILDING # 7: Larry Silverstein, owner of
>the World Trade Center complex, admitted during a September 2002 PBS
>documentary entitled America Rebuilds that he ordered WTC #7 to be
>destroyed via a controlled demolition late on the afternoon of 9-11.
>Building 7 was not even struck by an airplane, and only had a miniscule
>fire inside it which was contained to one floor. When was this building
>wired for demolition  on the afternoon of 9-11 when pandemonium ensued
>throughout Manhattan, or beforehand? In addition, who specifically were the
>people who wired the building, whether on 9-11 or beforehand?
>
>QUESTION THREE  WORLD TRADE CENTER TOWERS: The government/mainstream media
>version of events contends that the Twin Towers collapsed due to intense
>heat created by fire. Yet it takes a temperature of 2795 degrees to melt
>the type of construction-grade steel used to build the WTC, while jet fuel
>only burns at a maximum temperature of 1472 degrees. Also, all of the jet
>fuel that spilled from the airliners burned-up within a matter of 1-2
>minutes. Thirdly, never in the history of the world has a steel building
>collapsed due to fire, including those which burned for infinitely longer
>periods of time with much more intense flames. Fourthly, the South Tower
>was struck 17 minutes after the North Tower, had most of the fuel from the
>jet splash outside the building, and burned at a much slower pace. Yet it
>fell 30 minutes before the North Tower. How can this highly improbably (not
>to mention physically impossible) scenario be explained? Lastly, when we
>bring physics into the equation and put to use a scientific formula to
>calculate how long it takes a structure to do a resistance-free gravity
>fall from top to bottom (H= ½at2) , we would find that the WTC towers would
>drop in approximately nine seconds  which is exactly how long it took both
>of them to fall. How can this phenomenon be explained, considering all the
>massive columns, floors, walls, and equipment inside each tower that would
>provide considerable resistance? Also, just out of curiosity, explain the
>pool of molten steel that burned seven-stories beneath ground level at both
>towers for 5-6 weeks after 9-11? Did this also derive from the miniscule
>amount of jet fuel that that burned out in 1-2 minutes?
>
>QUESTION FOUR  HIJACKERS STILL ALIVE: Five of the 19 men purported to have
>been suicide hijackers on the morning of 9-11 have been verifiably proven
>to still be alive and well. FIVE OF THEM. In addition, not one Arab name
>was found on any of the passenger records for any of the four hijacked
>airliners on the morning of 9-11. How do we account for these
>discrepancies?
>
>QUESTION FIVE  LACK OF PILOTING SKILLS: While on the subject of
>'hijackers,' there is an overwhelming amount of first-hand testimony
>presented by the flight instructors who gave lessons to the supposed pilots
>at the schools they attended prior to 9-11. While acting as
>pilots-in-training, they were unanimously characterized as incompetent,
>inept, and without the mechanical skills to even operate an automobile, let
>alone an airplane. These instructors also stated that these men were
>utterly incapable of performing the highly complex maneuvers utilized on
>9-11. How could these men  Afghanistani cave-dwellers  who were nicknamed
>"Dumb and Dumber," miraculously be able to execute moves that were only
>achievable by the upper Top Gun elite of our Air Force?
>
>QUESTION SIX  MILITARY STAND-DOWN: From September, 2000 to June, 2001, the
>Pentagon launched fighter jets 67 times to intercept wayward planes. In
>fact, a very rigid set of rules, procedures, and protocol has been in place
>for years that have to be lawfully followed whenever any type of aircraft
>strays off its course or is hijacked. Within the past decade, and every day
>after 9-11, these procedures have been followed to a T, and have not been
>corrupted or ignored. Yet on the morning of 9-11, on FOUR separate
>occasions, this system fell apart beyond comprehension. In fact, from the
>time the FAA discovered that the first plane had been hijacked until the
>Pentagon was struck - a total of 84 MINUTES had elapsed. On top of that,
>the Pentagon houses the NMCC (National Military Command Center), and
>possesses anti-aircraft and missile installations; yet none of these
>protective devices were activated or used  even after EVERYONE knew that
>the WTC towers had been attacked. This outrage so far exceeds mere
>incompetence that author David Ray Griffin wrote, "The attacks could not
>have succeeded unless some U.S. officials had given stand-down orders for
>standard operating procedures to be cancelled on that particular day." How
>are all of these curious anomalies explained?
>
>QUESTION SEVEN  FLIGHT 93: Wreckage from Flight 93 that was downed in
>Pennsylvania was strewn over an area stretching for eight miles from the
>crash site. Is this physically possible from a mere plane wreck, or was
>this flight shot from the sky, thus leaving a trail of parts (some of the
>pieces weighing over 1000 pounds) for eight miles?
>
>QUESTION EIGHT  9/11 WAR GAMES: On the morning of 9-11, the CIAs National
>Reconnaissance Office (NRO), headed by John Fulton, was performing test
>exercise 'war games' where jet planes were to be flown into buildings. In
>addition, NORAD was also conducting an exercise called Vigilant Warrior.
>Why hasn't the American public been told about these tests, and why has
>nearly every member of the Bush administration stated that they could have
>never conceived of airplanes hitting buildings where there have been
>numerous government studies documenting this very subject (with Donald
>Rumsfeld being well aware of all of them)? Lastly, if the FAA, NORAD, and
>NMCC were all 'confused' on the morning of 9-11 as to whether these
>exercises were tests or the real thing, how did the 'hijackers'
>coincidentally know which day to select for their attacks?
>
>QUESTION NINE  9/11 PRE-KNOWLEDGE: While the subject of pre-knowledge is on
>the table, when President Bush was whisked-out of the infamous Florida
>classroom where he read a book about goats, it was revealed that the
>'terrorists' had obtained top secret codes for the White House and Air
>Force One. The NSA's top secret Echelon surveillance system had also been
>cracked; while the CEO of Israel's Odigo Instant Messaging service admitted
>that text messages warning of the 9-11 attacks had been transmitted two
>hours before the WTC had been struck. Further, the short-selling of stocks
>relating to insider information for both American and United Airlines can
>be directly traced back to the CIA's Buzzy Krongard. Are we to believe that
>19 cave-dwellers in Afghanistan had the capabilities to derive this inside
>information, and why hasn't the CIA (which uses Echelon and Promis software
>to monitor such stock trading) revealed who was behind the highly suspect
>short-selling of stocks?
>
>QUESTION TEN  REMOVAL OF EVIDENCE: Finally, if you want direct evidence,
>why don't you question why the government immediately hauled-away all of
>the physical evidence from the World Trade Center without even a cursory
>inspection from FEMA, fire inspectors, or the FBI, which is a direct
>violation of every ethic and law concerning a crime scene? Also, why did
>the government immediately bring in wrecking balls to destroy the
>Pentagon's façade, while at the same time removing every piece of evidence
>without inspection? In addition, why did they immediately tear up the lawn
>in front of the Pentagon (which revealed no tire, burn, or scorch marks)?
>Why did the FBI retrieve every videotape from a variety of gas stations and
>locales surrounding the Pentagon; then refuse to make them public? Further,
>why has the Pentagon only released five frames of videotape from the
>attacks that THEY filmed? Why not the entire film for public scrutiny and
>review? Likewise, why won't the FAA make available tape recordings made by
>air traffic controllers on the morning of 9-11 that contradict the official
>cover-story?
>
>CONCLUSION: Art, due to the length of these questions, I did not provide
>any corroborating source material for you to verify these statements. But
>if you wish, I will immediately provide for you (without delay) the
>necessary footnotes and resources for you to fact-check each and every
>detail.
>
>On the morning of June 13, 2004 you made an outrageous, unfounded statement
>that 9-11 truth-seekers were asinine, reprehensible, horrendous, and didn't
>have a shred of proof. The ball is now in your court, Mr. Bell  are you man
>enough to back-up your words (as I have), or will you continue to hide
>behind your microphone and shrink from your responsibility as a broadcaster
>and American to give us the truth? Millions of your listeners and readers
>are awaiting your response.
>
>E-mail these questions to Art at: artbell at mindspring.com
>
>
>Home | Submissions | Bookstore | Past Issues | Donations | Contact Us
>Copyright © 2004, WING TV ®  All rights reserved. Website by pcStudios.
>March 5, 2006
>http://www.wingtv.net/bell.html



------ End of Forwarded Message