[Mb-civic] What Bush supporters think!

ean at sbcglobal.net ean at sbcglobal.net
Sun Oct 24 15:49:22 PDT 2004


Published on Friday, October 22, 2004 by OneWorld.net  
Three of Four Bush Supporters Still Believe in Iraqi WMD, al Qaeda Ties  
by Jim Lobe 
  http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1022-01.htm
WASHINGTON – Three out of four self-described supporters of President 
George W. Bush still believe that pre-war Iraq had weapons of mass 
destruction (WMD) or active programs to produce them and that Iraqi 
President Saddam Hussein provided “substantial support” to al Qaeda, 
according to a new survey released here Thursday. 

Moreover, as many or more Bush supporters hold those beliefs today than 
they did several months ago, before the publication of a series of well-
publicized official government reports that debunked both notions. 

Those are among the most striking findings of the survey, which was 
conducted in mid-October by the University of Maryland’s Program on 
International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) and Knowledge Networks, a California-
based polling firm. 



Remarkably, asked whether the U.S. should have gone to war with Iraq if 
U.S. intelligence had concluded that Baghdad did not have a WMD program 
and was not providing support to al Qaeda, 58 percent of Bush supporters 
said no, and 61 percent said they assumed that Bush would also not have 
gone to war under those circumstances. 
 
 
The survey, which polled the views of nearly 900 randomly chosen 
respondents equally divided between Bush supporters and those intending to 
vote for Democratic Sen. John Kerry, found a yawning gap in the world 
views, particularly as regards pre-war Iraq, between the two groups. 

“It is normal during elections for supporters of presidential candidates to have 
fundamental disagreements about values or strategies,” according to an 
analysis produced by PIPA. “The current election is unique in that Bush 
supporters and Kerry supporters have profoundly different perceptions of 
reality. In the face of a stream of high-level assessments about pre-war Iraq, 
Bush supporters cling to the refuted beliefs that Iraq had WMD or supported 
al Qaeda.” 

Indeed, the only issue on which the survey found broad agreement between 
the two sets of voters was on the question of whether the Bush 
administration itself has been actively propagating the misconceptions about 
Iraq’s WMD and connections to al Qaeda. 

“One of the reasons that Bush supporters have these (erroneous) beliefs is 
that they perceive the Bush administration confirming them,” noted Steven 
Kull, PIPA’s director. “Interestingly, this is one point on which Bush and Kerry 
supporters agree.” 

The survey also found a major gap between Bush’s stated positions on a 
number of international issues and what his supporters believe Bush’s 
position to be. A strong majority of Bush supporters believe, for example that 
the president supports a range of international treaties and institutions which 
is actually on record as opposing. 

On pre-war Iraq, the survey asked each respondent questions about WMD 
and links to al Qaeda on three levels: 1) what the respondents themselves 
believed about the two issues; (2) what they believed that “most experts” had 
concluded about them; and 3) what they believed the Bush administration 
was saying about them. 

The survey found that 72 percent of Bush supporters believe either that Iraq 
had actual WMD (47 percent) or a major program for producing them (25 
percent), despite the widespread media coverage in early October of the 
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA’s) “Duelfer Report,” the final word on the 
subject by the one billion dollar, 15-month investigation by the Iraq Survey 
Group. 

It found that that Hussein had dismantled all of his WMD programs shortly 
after the 1991 Gulf War and had never tried to reconstitute them. 

Nonetheless, 56 percent of Bush supporters said they believed that most 
experts currently believe that Iraq had actual WMD, and 57 percent said they 
thought that the Duelfer Report had itself concluded that Iraq either had 
WMD (19 percent) or a major WMD program (38 percent). 

Only 26 percent of Kerry supporters, by contrast, said they believed that pre-
war Iraq had either actual WMD or a WMD program, and only 18 percent 
said they believed that “most experts” agreed. 

Similar results were found with respect to Hussein’s alleged support for al 
Qaeda, a theory that has been most persistently asserted by Vice president 
Dick Cheney, but that was thoroughly debunked by the final report of the 
bipartisan 9/11 Commission earlier this summer. 

Seventy-five percent of Bush supporters said they believed that Iraq was 
providing “substantial” support to Al Qaeda, with 20 percent asserting that 
Iraq was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks on New York and the Pentagon. 
Sixty-three percent of Bush supporters even believed that the clear evidence 
of such support has actually been found, and 60 percent believe that “most 
experts” have reached the same conclusion. 

By contrast, only 30 percent of Kerry supporters said they believe that such a 
link existed and that most experts agree. 

But large majorities of both Bush and Kerry supporters agree that the 
administration is saying that Iraq had WMD and was providing substantial 
support to al Qaeda. In regard to WMD, those majorities have actually grown 
since last summer, according to PIPA. 

On WMD, 82 percent of Bush supporters and 84 percent of Kerry supporters 
believed that the administration is saying that Iraq either had WMD or major 
WMD programs. On ties with al Qaeda, 75 percent of Bush supporters and 
74 percent of Kerry supporters believe that the administration is saying that 
Iraq provided substantial support to the terrorist group. 

Remarkably, asked whether the U.S. should have gone to war with Iraq if 
U.S. intelligence had concluded that Baghdad did not have a WMD program 
and was not providing support to al Qaeda, 58 percent of Bush supporters 
said no, and 61 percent said they assumed that Bush would also not have 
gone to war under those circumstances. 

“To support the president and to accept that he took the U.S. to war based on 
mistaken assumptions,” said Kull, “likely creates substantial cognitive 
dissonance and leads Bush supporters to suppress awareness of unsettling 
information about pre-war Iraq.” 

Kull added that this “cognitive dissonance” could also help explain other 
remarkable findings in the survey, particularly with respect to Bush 
supporters’ misperceptions about the president’s own positions. 

In particular, majorities or Bush supporters incorrectly assumed that he 
supports multilateral approaches to various international issues, including the 
Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) (69 percent), the land mine 
treaty (72 percent), and the Kyoto Protocol to curb greenhouse gas 
emissions that contribute to global warming (51 percent). 

In August, two thirds of Bush supporters also said they believed that Bush 
supported the International Criminal Court (ICC), although in the latest poll, 
that figure dropped to a 53 percent majority, even though Bush explicitly 
denounced the ICC in the most widely watched nationally televised debate of 
the campaign in late September. 

In all of these cases, majorities of Bush supporters said they favored the 
positions that they imputed, incorrectly, to Bush. 

Large majorities of Kerry supporters, on the other hand, showed they knew 
both their candidate’s and Bush’s positions on the same issues. 

Bush supporters were also found to hold misperceptions regarding 
international support for the president and his policies. 

Despite a steady flow over the past year of official statements by foreign 
governments and public-opinion polls showing strong opposition to the Iraq 
war, less than one third of Bush supporters believed that most people in 
foreign countries opposed the U.S. having gone to war. 

Two thirds said they believed that foreign views were either evenly divided on 
the war (42 percent) or that the majority of foreigners actually favored the war 
(26 percent). 

Three of every four Kerry supporters, on the other hand, said it was their 
understanding that the most of the rest of the world opposed the war. 

Similarly, polls conducted during the summer in 35 major countries around 
the world found that majorities or pluralities in 30 of them favored Kerry for 
president over Bush by an average of margin of greater than two to one. 

Yet 57 percent of Bush supporters said they believed a majority of people 
outside the U.S. favored Bush re-election, and 33 percent said foreign 
opinion was evenly divided. 

Two thirds of Kerry supporters said they though their candidate was favored 
overseas; only one percent said they though most people abroad preferred 
Bush. 

Kull, who has been analyzing U.S. public opinion on foreign-policy issues for 
two decades, said misperceptions of Bush supporters showed, if anything, 
that hold that the president has over his loyalists. 

“The roots of the Bush supporters’ resistance to information very likely lie in 
the traumatic experience of 9/11 and equally into the near pitch-perfect 
leadership that President Bush showed in its immediate wake,” he said. 

“This appears to have created a powerful bond between Bush and his 
supporters – and an idealized image of the President that makes it difficult for 
his supporters to imagine that he could have made incorrect judgments 
before the war, that world public opinion would be critical of his policies or 
that the president could hold foreign-policy positions that are at odds with his 
supporters.” 

© Copyright 2004 OneWorld.net

###
 
 

-- 
You are currently on Mha Atma's Earth Action Network email list, option D 
(up to 3 emails/day).  To be removed, or to switch options (option A - 
1x/week, option B - 3/wk, option C - up to 1x/day, option D - up to 3x/day) 
please reply and let us know!  If someone forwarded you this email and you 
want to be on our list, send an email to ean at sbcglobal.net and tell us which 
option you'd like.



Action is the antidote to despair.  ----Joan Baez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.islandlists.com/pipermail/mb-civic/attachments/20041024/8223b21d/attachment.html


More information about the Mb-civic mailing list